Search found 14 matches

by tvierling
Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:47 am
Forum: Suggestion Box
Topic: 6to4: native or via upstreams?
Replies: 6
Views: 16600

Unfortunately, a 6to4 relay only shortens the return path, though that might still be some benefit to some customers such as myself who have their primary mail server residing at a 6to4 address. On the other hand, a teredo relay shortens both directions to the equivalent IPv4 route. When I setup mi...
by tvierling
Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:19 am
Forum: Suggestion Box
Topic: 6to4: native or via upstreams?
Replies: 6
Views: 16600

We don't have a 6to4 relay; we're just sending the packets upstream with the rest of it. Ah, then I guess "Suggestion Box" is the right place for the question after all. ;) Just something to consider adding. Since v4 is still inherently more "well-connected" than v6, doing the 6...
by tvierling
Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:51 am
Forum: Suggestion Box
Topic: 6to4: native or via upstreams?
Replies: 6
Views: 16600

6to4: native or via upstreams?

In the installations I've helped set up, I've always recommended setting up the 2002::/16 route at the border so as not to depend on upstreams for 6to4 outbound relaying. (The problem is mainly that, for those carriers who do provide a 2002::/16 route, it's usually overloaded, involves roundabout an...
by tvierling
Wed Sep 19, 2007 2:00 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: Selective Forwarding problem - multiple destinations
Replies: 9
Views: 10104

I just noticed there's a mix up between forwarding and the valid user tests... The problem is that it should skip the valid user table settings if a forward map is found, but it's not. I'll work on it. I'll try to roll forward-to-hosted accounts functionality into the same update. Ah, I've actually...
by tvierling
Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:10 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: Selective Forwarding problem - multiple destinations
Replies: 9
Views: 10104

glendale2x wrote:It worked, so I'm deploying the changes now. Thanks for pointing this out!
Woo, that rocks! You're one step closer to the flexibility of the Google Apps control panel, although WAY ahead of them in terms of spam filtering... :)
by tvierling
Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:37 am
Forum: Support
Topic: Selective Forwarding problem - multiple destinations
Replies: 9
Views: 10104

Selective Forwarding problem - multiple destinations

This is probably more of a uniqueness violation or documentation issue than a feature request. It's possible to create multiple selective forwarding entries for a given address. However, only the "first" one in the list is actually used, regardless of how many are enabled. While I'd *like*...
by tvierling
Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:29 am
Forum: Suggestion Box
Topic: Hosted Mailbox suggestion - Allow on regular domains
Replies: 2
Views: 4501

Hosted Mailbox suggestion - Allow on regular domains

Probably more difficult to implement, but why not allow mailboxes to exist on domains that do other things with non-matching addresses? Let's say there's a SMTP Redirection domain example.com with selective forwarding turned on. If mailboxes were also allowed for these domains, you could have the se...
by tvierling
Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:26 am
Forum: Support
Topic: Hosted Mailbox problem - valid user table needed
Replies: 1
Views: 6305

Hosted Mailbox problem - valid user table needed

It seems that the valid user table is not allowed when in hosted mailbox mode. This is a problem, because it's not possible to set up entries corresponding to selective forwarding, nor is it possible to set up a restricted set of valid addresses that end up in a catch-all box. Also, it seems that an...
by tvierling
Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:20 am
Forum: Support
Topic: logs incredibly slow?
Replies: 4
Views: 7013

Or it could be all MySQL's falut and we need to move the log database to Postgres or something else that likes processing 100+ million rows. =) It does return results rather quickly without group/sort clauses, so it's the copy to temp table and sort stage that's causing the headaches. PostgreSQL R0...
by tvierling
Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:21 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: logs incredibly slow?
Replies: 4
Views: 7013

logs incredibly slow?

This is a longstanding problem, but it continues to worry me because it seems to lock up the account control center at times -- and if that's locking out other users, then "ick." Anyway, log searches on my domains, some of which get almost no mail at all, can take upwards of 10 minutes to ...
by tvierling
Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:45 am
Forum: Support
Topic: Reminder: Valid User Table Policy (old)
Replies: 17
Views: 27233

Here is the RBL list I use (hint, use the bulk add feature): bl.spamcop.net [remove] You should not be using bl.spamcop.net as a blacklist unless you feel like rejecting 10% or more of legitimate mail. Spamcop itself states that the list should be used for scoring, not outright blocking, because it...
by tvierling
Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:41 am
Forum: Support
Topic: Reminder: Valid User Table Policy (old)
Replies: 17
Views: 27233

Re: How to deal with spam?

We are running anti-spam software on our server and it is rejecting a fair amount of the mail coming through Rollernet's servers with a 5XX error code because it is spam. The user accounts being sent to, however, are valid. In this situation, in order to prevent the valid accounts from being disabl...
by tvierling
Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:41 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: Reminder: Valid User Table Policy (old)
Replies: 17
Views: 27233

Catchall domains

Just to verify, domains that do indeed have a "catchall" account on the receiving end, and thus which should not (in normal circumstances) reject Roller Network mail to such a domain at all -- not counting explicit deny rules -- can still be in Default Allow mode without problems? (I've pe...
by tvierling
Fri May 05, 2006 10:53 am
Forum: Support
Topic: Problem receiving e-mail
Replies: 3
Views: 5704

Re: Problem receiving e-mail

First off, I would like to thank rollernet for all their hard work! Their service has been very reliable! On to my problem. As of yesterday, I've noticed I am not receiving e-mails. In looking at the logs here at rollernet, I've noticed the following: Connection from 209.123.8.28 (halo.idns3.com) r...