Search found 14 matches
- Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:47 am
- Forum: Suggestion Box
- Topic: 6to4: native or via upstreams?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 19209
Unfortunately, a 6to4 relay only shortens the return path, though that might still be some benefit to some customers such as myself who have their primary mail server residing at a 6to4 address. On the other hand, a teredo relay shortens both directions to the equivalent IPv4 route. When I setup mi...
- Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:19 am
- Forum: Suggestion Box
- Topic: 6to4: native or via upstreams?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 19209
- Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:51 am
- Forum: Suggestion Box
- Topic: 6to4: native or via upstreams?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 19209
6to4: native or via upstreams?
In the installations I've helped set up, I've always recommended setting up the 2002::/16 route at the border so as not to depend on upstreams for 6to4 outbound relaying. (The problem is mainly that, for those carriers who do provide a 2002::/16 route, it's usually overloaded, involves roundabout an...
- Wed Sep 19, 2007 2:00 pm
- Forum: Support
- Topic: Selective Forwarding problem - multiple destinations
- Replies: 9
- Views: 10273
I just noticed there's a mix up between forwarding and the valid user tests... The problem is that it should skip the valid user table settings if a forward map is found, but it's not. I'll work on it. I'll try to roll forward-to-hosted accounts functionality into the same update. Ah, I've actually...
- Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:10 pm
- Forum: Support
- Topic: Selective Forwarding problem - multiple destinations
- Replies: 9
- Views: 10273
- Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:37 am
- Forum: Support
- Topic: Selective Forwarding problem - multiple destinations
- Replies: 9
- Views: 10273
Selective Forwarding problem - multiple destinations
This is probably more of a uniqueness violation or documentation issue than a feature request. It's possible to create multiple selective forwarding entries for a given address. However, only the "first" one in the list is actually used, regardless of how many are enabled. While I'd *like*...
- Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:29 am
- Forum: Suggestion Box
- Topic: Hosted Mailbox suggestion - Allow on regular domains
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4617
Hosted Mailbox suggestion - Allow on regular domains
Probably more difficult to implement, but why not allow mailboxes to exist on domains that do other things with non-matching addresses? Let's say there's a SMTP Redirection domain example.com with selective forwarding turned on. If mailboxes were also allowed for these domains, you could have the se...
- Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:26 am
- Forum: Support
- Topic: Hosted Mailbox problem - valid user table needed
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6407
Hosted Mailbox problem - valid user table needed
It seems that the valid user table is not allowed when in hosted mailbox mode. This is a problem, because it's not possible to set up entries corresponding to selective forwarding, nor is it possible to set up a restricted set of valid addresses that end up in a catch-all box. Also, it seems that an...
- Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:20 am
- Forum: Support
- Topic: logs incredibly slow?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7146
Or it could be all MySQL's falut and we need to move the log database to Postgres or something else that likes processing 100+ million rows. =) It does return results rather quickly without group/sort clauses, so it's the copy to temp table and sort stage that's causing the headaches. PostgreSQL R0...
- Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:21 pm
- Forum: Support
- Topic: logs incredibly slow?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7146
logs incredibly slow?
This is a longstanding problem, but it continues to worry me because it seems to lock up the account control center at times -- and if that's locking out other users, then "ick." Anyway, log searches on my domains, some of which get almost no mail at all, can take upwards of 10 minutes to ...
- Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:45 am
- Forum: Support
- Topic: Reminder: Valid User Table Policy (old)
- Replies: 17
- Views: 27708
Here is the RBL list I use (hint, use the bulk add feature): bl.spamcop.net [remove] You should not be using bl.spamcop.net as a blacklist unless you feel like rejecting 10% or more of legitimate mail. Spamcop itself states that the list should be used for scoring, not outright blocking, because it...
- Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:41 am
- Forum: Support
- Topic: Reminder: Valid User Table Policy (old)
- Replies: 17
- Views: 27708
Re: How to deal with spam?
We are running anti-spam software on our server and it is rejecting a fair amount of the mail coming through Rollernet's servers with a 5XX error code because it is spam. The user accounts being sent to, however, are valid. In this situation, in order to prevent the valid accounts from being disabl...
- Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:41 pm
- Forum: Support
- Topic: Reminder: Valid User Table Policy (old)
- Replies: 17
- Views: 27708
Catchall domains
Just to verify, domains that do indeed have a "catchall" account on the receiving end, and thus which should not (in normal circumstances) reject Roller Network mail to such a domain at all -- not counting explicit deny rules -- can still be in Default Allow mode without problems? (I've pe...
- Fri May 05, 2006 10:53 am
- Forum: Support
- Topic: Problem receiving e-mail
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5886
Re: Problem receiving e-mail
First off, I would like to thank rollernet for all their hard work! Their service has been very reliable! On to my problem. As of yesterday, I've noticed I am not receiving e-mails. In looking at the logs here at rollernet, I've noticed the following: Connection from 209.123.8.28 (halo.idns3.com) r...