SPF Tagging

Need help? Ask here.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Black20VT
Posts: 134
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:35 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

SPF Tagging

Post by Black20VT »

Hi,

I've just checked a few headers, and I'm seeing the following;

X-Rollernet-Spf: tagging disabled

However, I've the SPF Filter set as;

Pass - Accept
All others - Tag

Is this therefore the correct outcome, or am I misunderstanding?

It's also showing as disabled for Hotmail.

Thanks.
RollerNetSupport
Site Admin
Posts: 598
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 10:05 pm
Location: Nevada
Contact:

Post by RollerNetSupport »

pass "accept" will generate the tagging disabled message if the SPF result was pass. If you change it to pass "tag" you should get "X-Rollernet-Spf: pass" as the header.
Technical Support support@rollernet.us
Roller Network LLC
Black20VT
Posts: 134
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:35 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Black20VT »

RollerNetSupport wrote:pass "accept" will generate the tagging disabled message if the SPF result was pass. If you change it to pass "tag" you should get "X-Rollernet-Spf: pass" as the header.
I've just changed the setting to "tag" and now see the pass message.

I guess I expected to see something referring to an SPF pass elsewhere in the headers, perhaps in the SPAM header somewhere?

Even if SPF pass to accept, could it still not display in the SPF header?
RollerNetSupport
Site Admin
Posts: 598
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 10:05 pm
Location: Nevada
Contact:

Post by RollerNetSupport »

True, there is no real difference between "accept" and "tag". It's something we can clean up in the interface (i.e. drop the entire "tag" column and add a single "header tagging yes/no" option), but since it works, we haven't found time to mess with it yet. ;)
Technical Support support@rollernet.us
Roller Network LLC
Black20VT
Posts: 134
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:35 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Black20VT »

RollerNetSupport wrote:True, there is no real difference between "accept" and "tag". It's something we can clean up in the interface (i.e. drop the entire "tag" column and add a single "header tagging yes/no" option), but since it works, we haven't found time to mess with it yet. ;)
That's fair enough, I just like to see exactly what's going on where possible.

Thanks for looking :wink:
Post Reply